Yesterday, Sascha Riley’s (born 1973) allegations against Donald Trump and several others began to blow up on social media. In the past, Riley has revealed tidbits of his allegations on his own social media accounts. But on November 23, 2025, Lisa Noelle Voldeng’s Substack post Don’t worry. Boys are hard to find Part 1 of 2 provided links to six audio files she recorded while interviewing Riley in July 2025.
Riley’s allegations should be carefully reviewed and discussed with extreme caution. My fear is that Riley’s account of multiple sexual abuse incidents with Donald Trump could be used to muddy the waters and undermine other victims whose allegations are supported by credible evidence.
Sascha Riley’s Allegations
Riley (born 1973) alleges he was sex trafficked by his adoptive parents to a criminal ring led by Donald Trump in the early-mid 1980s. Riley alleges Epstein was lower in the enterprise. Riley claims that the ring made snuff films of children being raped and murdered.
Riley alleges that sometime around 1980-1981, he first encountered Donald Trump, who killed several puppies, then sexually assaulted Riley. Trump allegedly paid Riley’s parent’s for the experience.
“I think the payday that they were supposed to get was $25,000.” Riley said.
Riley alleges that sometime in 1982-1983, while he was at an unspecified location in a barn, he witnessed 4 or 5 big guys shoot to death a girl named Patricia while she was on a bed. The men threatened Riley: “If you don’t do everything that the next person coming in here wants, we’re gonna shoot you, just like we did to her.” Then, they went to find another bed.
That’s when Donald Trump came in. Riley felt like they were going to kill him. Donald Trump allegedly laid on his stomach, face down in the bed. That’s when Riley alleges he put a condom over a wooden tent stake, put the stake inside Trump’s butt, then kicked the stake in an attempt to kill him.
Riley allegedly caused Trump to be “life flighted” out because Riley “ripped him open.”
During the interview, Voldeng laughed and asked Riley if he had ever seen The Equalizer with Denzel Washington. This part of the interview, which is about 50 minutes into the first recording, labeled “A of 6” significantly undermines Voldeng’s credibility and the serious nature of the allegations. It reveals Voldengs lack of professionalism and competence.
Riley goes on to allege others involved in the ring included Andy Biggs, Jim Jordan, Lindsey Graham, and Clerence Thomas.
Riley alleges that his parents discussed Vladimir Putin’s a lot. But this is improbable given that Putin was a low rank KGB official in the mid 1980s. Putin’s name only became publicly known in America about a decade and a half later in 1999, when he became the Prime Minister of Russia.
Jim Jordan is a truly despicable individual, but he is only 11 years older that Riley. It seems improbable that Jim Jordan, would have had access to Donald Trump and the so-called “Dixie Mafia” while Jordan was in high school—let alone while attending University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Riley alleges that it was also a fighting ring, where groups would watch bare knuckle fightings between adults and children. Riley says he was pitted against Jim Jordan. At the time Jim Jordan would have been about 17-22 years old.
Voldeng’s Substack post also includes a bible passage and politically charged rhetoric, which undermine her credibility as someone reporting on a serious topic. Her approach to the interview is unprofessional, often inserting her personal opinions and characterizations of the individuals involved.
My concern is Sascha Riley’s allegations do not fit the typical timeline we’ve known from other credible victims. Riley claims that Trump and Epstein were running the ring in the early 1980s. But there is no known association between the duo until 1987 or thereafter.
Riley mentions that his adoptive mother struggled with pronouncing Ghislaine Maxwell’s name. But Maxwell was not associated with Epstein until the early 90s. In 1983, Ghislaine Maxwell would have been 22 years old.
Because Riley’s allegations appear to be greatly exaggerated, they could be used to undermine, mock, and humiliate other credible victims.
That’s not to say that Riley’s claims shouldn’t be taken seriously, but at this point I think it’s critical to find corroborating evidence, which is obviously difficult given that the incident allegedly occurred more than 4.5 decades ago.
People believe every single bit of it’s not just about Trump. It’s about Clarence Thomas Peter T Jim, Jordan, Lindsey Graham
It won’t be popular to be skeptical of this, but thank you. Another point in the interview that caused me to pause was where the interviewer tried to suggest that there was “Satanism” involved, when Sascha did not even hint at such a thing. The interviewer is heavily biased toward Christianity.
That said, I do think this testimony should be treated seriously. I would like to see his allegations vetted where possible.